Islam, an
example of an ethics of divine command based on a tradition of legal-ethical
commentary, one that guides the lives of millions of observant Muslims
throughout the world today. It is often
remarked that the characteristic feature of the Islamic community is its deep
sense of Divine Law prescribes by God, the source and guide of action to which
the faithful “commit.” For Muslims there
is little, if any, distinction among what is legal, ethical, and
religious. It is quite natural then that
the expositions of Islamic law all begin with elaborate consideration of
religious duties, such as ritual purity, prayer, and pilgrimage. (Livingston)
According to
IslamicEthics-Worldviews, there is no division of ethics and law in Islam. Because of the linkage between Islamic ethics
and law, a study of Islamic ethics is more fruitful when done in conjunction
with a study of Islamic law. Historically,
Muslims derive their Islamic ethics from the Qur’an and the Hadith.
Living in the light of God; Islamic law and ethical obligation by Khaled Abou El
Fadl, raises the question of how the law becomes known has occupied the minds
of Muslim jurists for a long time. In
the early centuries, the heated debates, and at times even hostilities, centered
around the place and role of ethical principles and reason in the development
of the religious tradition. At one pole
was the Mu’tazilis who argued that justice is knowable through human reason; at
the other pole, the traditionalists (ah-hadith) argued that reason is
necessarily whimsical and capricious, and that justice is only realized through
revelation.
However, in
modern times, this debate has formally subsided. Naturally, while there are liberals, like
Muhammad Iqbal, who wish to give rationality and reason a far greater role in
articulation of Islamic law, there are also fundamentalists, like Al Mawdudi,
who look to the law as the source of all morality and justice. The secularists exclude Islamic law from any
public function.
The Divine
Law (the shari’a) is both positive law and moral obligation. This is evident in the way that the jurists
classify human acts and duties in moral terms.
Most actions do not come within the law as we in the West conceive law
in our secular terms. How one must act
morally may not have any worldly legal validity but, at the same time, may come
under the strict sanction of Islamic law.
The moral character of legal actions is classified according to a
fivefold scheme:
1. Actions mandatory on believers
2. Actions recommended or desirable
3. Actions neutral or indifferent
4. Actions objectionable or
blame-worthy, but not forbidden
5. Actions prohibited
This scheme
helps devout Muslims to follow “the right way to the water,” that is, the
course of duty that will ensure their entry into Paradise on the Day of Judgment.
For us to
understand this complex system of Islamic law and ethics, we must study and
interpret the textual. We have seen that
the source and norms of ethical action are derived from those divine commands
that are set down in the sacred book of the Qur’an. Perhaps the greatest challenge to the great
world-historical religious traditions today is how to deal with the rich
diversity of their own sectarian development over time. The ethical question that they all face is,
to what extent can the moral claims that we make remain elastic? Can they be stretched to accommodate different
interpretations without sheer sophistry, without simply licensing incompatible
moral behavior? This is a critical
source of the struggle today between the Orthodox and Reform Jews, between
fundamentalists and liberal Christian groups in the US, and between similar
factions throughout the Muslim world. (Livingston)
Works Cited
Livingston, James C. Anatomy of the Sacred Sixth Edition.
New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc., 2009
El Fadi, Khaled A. “Living in the light of God; Islamic law
and ethical obligation” ABC Religion and ethics. (Feb.,25, 2013).
Rendered with permission from the
book, Understanding the Times: The Collision of Today’s Competing Worldviews
(Rev 2nd ed), David Noebel, Summit Press, 2006.
No comments:
Post a Comment